IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Jimmy Rushton
    Jimmy Rushton “Shoigu's replacement with a (relatively experienced and apparently competent) economist [Andrei Belousov] pretty clearly signals Putin believes victory in Ukraine will come via outproducing (and outlasting) Ukraine and her Western allies. He's preparing for many more years of war.” 10 hours ago
  • Konstantin Sonin
    Konstantin Sonin “Things are not going according to Putin's plan, but he will endlessly rotate the same small group of loyalists. Putin has always feared to bring new people to the positions of authority - even in the best of times, they must have been nobodies with no own perspectives. Toward the end of his rule, even more so.” 10 hours ago
  • Mark Galeotti
    Mark Galeotti “With an economist taking over the Defence Ministry, and the old minister taking up a policy and advisory role, the technocrats are in the ascendant. The goal though is not peace, but a more efficient war. As Putin digs in for the long term, with the 'special military operation' now being the central organising principle of his regime, he knows he needs technocrats to keep his war machine going.” 10 hours ago
  • Jeff Hawn
    Jeff Hawn “This indicates that the Kremlin is not seeking an exit from Ukraine, but once to extend their ability to endure the conflict as long as possible. Russia is very limited [on] how much they can increase scale, due to economic deficiencies. However, they can maintain a certain level of attritional warfare. And are likely hoping to do that longer than Ukraine can.” 11 hours ago
  • Dmitry Peskov
    Dmitry Peskov “Today, the winner on the battlefield is the one who is more open to innovation, more open to implementation as quickly as possible. It is natural that at the current stage the president [Vladimir Putin] decided that the Ministry of Defence should be headed by a civilian [Andrei Belousov].” 11 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h

#Palestine

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive with the tag #Palestine linked to them.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“Once again, the US's veto demonstrated a policy of it's my way or the highway. Palestine could only be a country the way the United States sees it, or Israel sees it, only at the time that it's suitable to the United States and within the geopolitics and the global interest of the United States. The US is sacrificing the freedom of Palestinian people for egotistical and narrow interests of the United States and Israel.”

author
Senior political analyst at Al Jazeera
Read More

“The thing about imperial powers like the UK and the US is that they don't give a damn about the action, in this case, the occupation. They care for the actor, and the actor is an ally, Israel. That's why this court is important, because this court does not see actors. It doesn't care about the identity of the actor, it only cares about the nature of the act. And in this case, it's 75 years of dispossession, 56 years of occupation. The UK and the US don't want you to know the legal opinion of this question, because what they care about is the cynical calculus of geopolitics.”

author
Senior political analyst at Al Jazeera
Read More

“The Americans and the British must realise that Yemen's position will not change and will not break. Rather, Yemen is becoming more steadfast and adhering to its position. It is escalating its operations against Israeli ships or those heading to the ports of occupied Palestine until the aggression stops and the siege on the Gaza Strip is lifted.”

author
Houthi official
Read More

“We shall not bow down to international dictates in regards to a future deal with the Palestinians. Such a compromise should be through direct negotiations with no preconditions. How can we give recognition to such a state after the massacre of October 7. This would be a reward for terrorism.”

author
Prime Minister of Israel
Read More

“Our position will not change in the direction of the Palestinian issue, whether a naval alliance is established or not. Only Israeli ships or those going to Israel would be targeted. Our position in support of Palestine and the Gaza Strip will remain until the end of the siege, the entry of food and medicine, and our support for the oppressed Palestinian people will remain continuous.”

author
Houthi official
Read More

“We said that we are ready for this state to be demilitarised, and there can also be guarantees of forces, whether NATO forces, United Nations forces, or Arab or American forces, until we achieve security for both states, the nascent Palestinian state and the Israeli state. A political resolution which calls for a Palestinian state based on the June 4, 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, has remained out of reach.”

author
President of Egypt
Read More

“I think that on this point, even if at this stage it seems almost hopeless, the idea of a two-state solution should not be taken off the table, it should not be buried … and that the Palestinians should be able to live securely in a state.”

author
Chancellor of Germany
Read More

“The stronger the Palestinian Authority is, the weaker Hamas will be. And the greater its ability to govern is, the more security we'll have and the less we'll have to do.”

author
Israeli Defence Minister
Read More

“He [Naftali Bennett] has made it very clear before he left his country that he's against a two-state solution; he's against a Palestinian state; he's against freezing settlements - three issues that are part and parcel of the core of the Biden approach to the Palestinians. Some people were hoping that during this visit there would be some serious give and take. But again, Afghanistan came to the rescue, and the agenda shifted; it was diluted.”

author
Executive director of the think-tank Arab Center Washington DC
Read More

“The Biden administration's policies have been horrific and despicable, and make the United States 100 percent complicit in Israel's massacres and atrocities against Palestinians. [Biden administration backing the ceasefire] It wasn't that they suddenly developed some type of moral backbone but rather that it responded to political pressure on the US streets and from progressive Democrats. All of this political pressure is what has been effective in moving the Biden administration toward a better position, but that type of pressure needs to be kept up now so that there is accountability after the ceasefire.”

author
Read More

“When Biden came into office the issue of Israel-Palestine was nowhere on the agenda. He assumed like many other people that the conflict really didn't matter, it wasn't an issue, [that] Israel can basically continue to do what it's doing, and we don't need to pay attention to this. Of course, the big question here is what happens the day after? What's Biden's plan? There's zero plan.”

author
Director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Denver
Read More

“The past ten days have witnessed a dangerous and horrific surge in deadly violence in the occupied Palestinian territory, particularly Gaza, and in Israel. I am deeply shocked by the continued air and artillery bombardment by the Israeli defence forces in Gaza. If there is a hell on earth, it is the lives of children in Gaza. Access for humanitarian goods is paramount. Attacks by militant groups on areas surrounding crossing points are unacceptable. Even wars have rules. Civilians must be protected. Indiscriminate attacks, and attacks against civilians and civilian property, are violations of the laws of war. There is no justification, including counterterrorism or self-defence, for the abdication by the parties to the conflict of their obligations under international humanitarian law.”

author
Secretary-general of the United Nations
Read More

“Israeli forces have displayed a shocking disregard for the lives of Palestinian civilians by carrying out a number of airstrikes targeting residential buildings, in some cases killing entire families – including children – and causing wanton destruction to civilian property, in attacks that may amount to war crimes or crimes against humanity.”

author
Statement of Amnesty International
Read More

“The priority is the immediate cessation of all violence and implementation of a ceasefire. The purpose is to protect civilians to give full humanitarian access in Gaza. We condemn the rocket attacks by Hamas and other terrorist groups on the Israeli territory, and we fully support Israel's right to defense. We have also considered and stated that this has to be done in a proportionate manner and respecting international humanitarian law.”

author
EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
Read More

“It's in no one's interest to continue fighting. My assessment is that you risk broader destabilisation, and you risk a whole series of negative consequences if the fighting continues. De-escalation is a smart course of action at this point for all parties concerned.”

author
US Army general and the 20th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Read More

“Like every state, Israel has the right and obligation to defend its people against 2000+ rockets fired at civilians only by Hamas, which is holding Palestinian civilians hostage in its war. We mourn all the victims. We urge [all sides] to refrain, stop the violence & seek peaceful solutions.”

author
Statement of Kosovo’s Foreign Ministry
Read More
May
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
0102030405
06070809101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
IPSEs by City
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Country
arrow