IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Sue Mi Terry
    Sue Mi Terry “Now is not the time to lift sanctions, either. Now, in fact, is the time to double down. If Biden wants to prevent North Korea from acting out, he needs to first provide the government with new incentives to talk-and that means new restrictions Washington can use as carrots. Biden, in other words, needs to take North Korean policy off autopilot and launch a proactive effort to deter Pyongyang. Otherwise, he risks encouraging an already emboldened Kim to stage a major provocation.” 12 hours ago
  • Christopher Cavoli
    Christopher Cavoli “Russians don't have the numbers necessary to do a strategic breakthrough. More to the point, they don't have the skill and capability to do it, to operate at the scale necessary to exploit any breakthrough to strategic advantage. They do have the ability to make local advances and they have done some of that.” 13 hours ago
  • Nazar Voloshin
    Nazar Voloshin “The situation in the Kharkiv sector remains complicated but is evolving in a dynamic manner. Our defence forces have partially stabilised the situation. The advance of the enemy in certain zones and localities has been halted.” 18 hours ago
  • Volodymyr Zelenskiy
    Volodymyr Zelenskiy “The situation in the Kharkiv region is generally under control, and our soldiers are inflicting significant losses on the occupier. However, the area remains extremely difficult.” 18 hours ago
  • Bezalel Smotrich
    Bezalel Smotrich “Defense Minister Gallant announced today his support for the establishment of a Palestinian terrorist state as a reward for terrorism and Hamas for the most terrible massacre of the Jewish people since the Holocaust.” 18 hours ago
  • Yoav Gallant
    Yoav Gallant “I must reiterate … I will not agree to the establishment of Israeli military rule in Gaza. Israel must not establish civilian rule in Gaza.” 19 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h

#nationalism

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive with the tag #nationalism linked to them.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“It's undeniable that China's image is in a poor state and looks unlikely to improve substantially any time soon. Countries around the world are worried most about Beijing's willingness to wield economic ties for political purposes. It's hard to see China reversing this trend in 2022, given both [Xi Jinping's] clear preference for foreign policy aggressiveness and popular Chinese nationalism.”

author
Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies
Read More

“The pandemic has fuelled a rise in nationalism and protectionism that will make the dismantling of barriers to labour mobility more difficult. Calls for reshoring in the name of increasing resilience of supply chains is the latest version of new protectionism.”

author
Visiting senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore
Read More

“These patrols have multiple objectives, including testing Taiwan's responses, training PRC pilots, sending warning signals to Taiwan's government, and stoking nationalism at home.”

author
Director of the Asia Program at the German Marshall Fund of the United States
Read More

“When we’re not engaged, when we don’t lead, then one of two things happen: either some other country tries to take our place, but probably not in a way that advances our interests or values. Or no one does, and then you get chaos. Either way, that does not serve the American people. We’ll engage the world not as it was, but as it is. A world of rising nationalism, receding democracy, growing rivalry with China, Russia, and other authoritarian states, mounting threats to a stable and open international system, and a technological revolution that is reshaping every aspect of our lives, especially in cyberspace.”

author
U.S. Secretary of State chosen by President-elect Joe Biden
Read More

“Nationalistic governments in both countries, an increasingly muscular and aggressive Chinese foreign policy, and an Indian move in Kashmir strongly opposed by Beijing are some of the factors responsible for the recent flare-up. In effect, there are unique factors at play that make this a crisis about a lot more than simple border provocations.”

author
Deputy director and senior associate at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
Read More

“Nationalism is strong under Modi and Xi Jinping, this is a ground reality. This is to be expected because both nations are modern states that have only been around for 70 years or so. We have to revisit this after a month and see if demobilisation has happened. Some reports say that both sides agreed to withdraw three kilometres, but because the Line of Actual Control is in itself a contentious issue, three kilometres from where exactly?”

author
Professor of Chinese Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi
Read More

“Beijing should certainly worry that the impact of the deadly clash could push India toward the U.S.. But these recent economic measures by India may not by themselves concern Beijing too much as it understands that Modi's government, facing rising domestic nationalism, has to do something to soothe the public sentiments and retain legitimacy.”

author
Director of the Centre for Asian Pacific Studies at Lingnan University
Read More

“My big fear is that the return to nationalism and protectionism is likely to deepen divisions between countries, to erode norms and standards of behavior, and erode the element of cooperation that has been fundamental to U.S. security and prosperity. We know what great power rivalry looks like. We know where it ends up.”

author
Former U.S. ambassador to NATO, co-author of the book “The Empty Throne: America’s Abdication of Global Leadership"
Read More
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Country
arrow