IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
  • No New Authors inserted in the last 24 hours
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Antony Blinken
    Antony Blinken “Under our own ten-year agreement, the United States will support the defence and security across a range of essential capabilities - from its air force to its air defence, from drones to demining. If Russia or anyone else were to attack Ukraine, we will work with Ukraine immediately at the highest levels to coordinate how to help you beat back the threat.” 3 hours ago
  • Aleksey Kushch
    Aleksey Kushch “This is an unexpected, but, unfortunately for Ukraine, a very effective move. Unlike many top Russian officials, Belousov has not been involved in corruption scandals and has a reputation as a workaholic technocrat and a devout Orthodox Christian. Putin wants him to clean the Augean stables of the defence ministry so that military spending spearheads the resurgence of Russia's economy. The effectiveness of Russia's military-industrial complex will be boosted, and instead of being a 'black hole' of budget spendings, the defence ministry may become a driver of economic growth, when war spendings stimulate the growth of Russia's GDP.” 7 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h
NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H
  • No New Contexts inserted in the last 24 hours
View All New Contexts inserted in the last 24h

#ICJ

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive with the tag #ICJ linked to them.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“The move [Egypt joining South Africa's ICJ genocide case against Israel] is an unbelievable diplomatic blow to Israel. Egypt is the cornerstone of our standing in the Middle East. The connections that Israel has in the Middle East and North Africa today, including with Jordan, the UAE and Morocco, is all a result of what Egypt did 40 years ago. With Egypt joining South Africa now in The Hague, it's a real diplomatic punch. Israel would have to take it very seriously. This is what I have been warning about. It's coming from several directions. Israel has to … listen to the world - not only to the Israeli public opinion asking now for revenge. We have to look overall in the wider picture, in the long-term security of Israel, not only in the next few weeks in Gaza.”

author
Former director of Israel’s foreign ministry
Read More

“The ICJ ruling puts a lot more pressure on the US and other Western allies to move on a ceasefire resolution. It makes it a lot harder for the US, along with Israel, to make the case to Western governments that are still very much concerned with international legitimacy, to maintain the idea that Israel is acting within the constraints of international law in Gaza and that it's acting in self-defence.”

author
Human rights lawyer and a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Read More

“Israeli politicians have already said that they're going to ignore the ICJ order. It is much harder for, particularly, the US and European states including the UK, to ignore the order because they have a much stronger record of holding or supporting the International Court of Justice.”

author
Executive director of Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights
Read More

“The ruling sends a strong message to Israel that the court views the situation as very serious and that Israel should do what it can to perform restraint in carrying out its military campaign.”

author
Assistant professor of international human rights law at Trinity College in Dublin who served as an associate legal officer at the International Court of Justice in The Hague from 2010 to 2014
Read More

“As demonstrated in several cases at the ICTY [International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia], the Yugoslav army and police committed countless war crimes and crimes against humanity in Kosovo, but it found little evidence of genocidal acts. Bringing a genocide case at the ICJ [International Court of Justice] is therefore very unwise.”

author
Associate professor of Southeast European Studies at Aarhus University in Denmark
Read More

“The motives of the comfort women are not financial reparations from the Japanese government, but an apology and acknowledgment of responsibility over the past, and to provide (correct) history education. Such goals are hard to attain through the domestic legal process. No matter what kind of ruling the ICJ [International Court of Justice] decides, it will have to judge whether the comfort women system was in violation of international law, and the testimonies of the victims would remain on the record. That in itself would be meaningful for the survivors.”

author
International law expert at Yonsei University, who is helping the victims bring the case to the world court
Read More

“In order for the ICJ [International Court of Justice] trial to take place, the two countries need to come to an agreement. But this looks less feasible at this time. The South Korean government has been focusing on improving relations with Japan and it would try to avoid creating another source of contention. Japan would also prefer not to publicize the comfort women issue on the international stage. Korea will want to stress the issue as a matter of wartime sexual violence and victims' human rights perspective, while Japan will assert the primacy of sovereign immunity and underline all wartime compensation issues were settled through the past bilateral accords.”

author
Expert on Japan at Seoul's Kookmin University
Read More
May
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
0102030405
06070809101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
IPSEs by City
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Country
arrow