IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Yair Lapid
    Yair Lapid “This government has to choose: return the abductees alive, or Ben Gvir and Smotrich, relations with the Americans or Ben Gvir and Smotrich, the Saudi deal or Ben Gvir and Smotrich, Israel's security or Ben Gvir and Smotrich.” 4 hours ago
  • Dmitry Peskov
    Dmitry Peskov “On the Ukrainian side, the panic is growing on the frontline. And this is first-hand information that there, on that side, the panic is growing. It is very important for us now to maintain this dynamics. It is very important not to stop and continue fulfilling [the tasks of the special military operation].” 7 hours ago
  • Oleksandr Syrskyi
    Oleksandr Syrskyi “In general, the enemy achieved certain tactical successes in these areas [villages of Berdychi and Semenivka, north of Avdiivka, and Novomykhailivka, near the town of Maryinka], but could not gain operational advantages.” 7 hours ago
  • Rina Shah
    Rina Shah “Protests in US universities are a display of democracy in action, a welcome sight in an election year marked by concerns of voter apathy chiefly due to Israel's war on Gaza. So when I see a movement like this of students taking peaceful, non-violent action and expressing their concern about the US government backing of Israel, of where our tax money is going, I think that's extremely healthy. These students are out there concerned about America's role in backing Benjamin Netanyahu. On the one hand, we are supplying weapons and funds to do what he wants to do in Gaza, while on the other we are sending humanitarian aid to Gaza. This is the hypocrisy these students are concerned about.” 22 hours ago
  • Thomas Friedman
    Thomas Friedman “But revenge is not a strategy. It is pure insanity that Israel is now more than six months into this war and the Israeli military leadership - and virtually the entire political class - has allowed Netanyahu to continue to pursue a 'total victory' there, including probably soon plunging deep into Rafah, without any exit plan or Arab partner lined up to step in once the war ends. If Israel ends up with an indefinite occupation of both Gaza and the West Bank, it would be a toxic military, economic and moral overstretch that would delight Israel's most dangerous foe, Iran, and repel all its allies in the West and the Arab world.” 22 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h
NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H
  • No New Contexts inserted in the last 24 hours
View All New Contexts inserted in the last 24h

#9/11

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive with the tag #9/11 linked to them.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“There are a number of reasons why these reserves remain inaccessible. First and foremost, the status of the funds is the subject of ongoing litigation, brought by certain victims of 9/11 and other terrorist attacks to hold judgments against the Taliban. These legal proceedings cannot be disregarded and have led to the temporary suspension of any movement of the funds through at least the end of the year and quite possibly longer. Second, the United States continues to face difficult fundamental questions about how it might be able to make reserve funds available to directly benefit the people of Afghanistan while ensuring that the funds do not benefit the Taliban. And, obviously, our objective as one of the world's biggest providers of humanitarian assistance is to get that assistance directly to the people. It is difficult to determine how that would not go through - would not benefit the Taliban as it relates to these funds. Third, the Taliban remain sanctioned by the United States as a specially designated global terrorist group, and a number of its officials are subject to the UN - UNSCR's 1988 sanctions regime. This raises immediate red flags for many states' central banks and the financial community more generally when considering any transactions.”

author
White House spokeswoman
Read More

“Democrats will most likely lose the midterms without an unprecedented event, because that is what happens to most governing parties almost every time. Since the second world war, the president's party has gained seats in the midterms only during the Clinton impeachment and after 9/11. They can't tinker with policy to jujitsu out of what's coming. The moderates decimating the Democratic agenda are goners either way. The best way forward is to pass good, lasting policy that improves people's lives and will build long-term support for the party and its objectives.”

author
Member of data team for the Bernie Sanders 2020 campaign and active member of the Democratic Socialists of America
Read More

“With this first release of documents, 20 years of Saudi Arabia counting on the US government to cover up its role in 9/11 comes to an end.”

author
Co-Chair of the Plaintiffs' Committee representing families in the 9/11 terrorism litigation case to hold Saudi Arabia accountable for its role in the September 11, 2001 attacks
Read More

“It's unclear what other parts of the government may have known what was going on, but clearly, fairly high-level and mid-level Saudi officials working for the government were part of this conspiracy.”

author
Lawyer with the law firm Kreindler LLP representing the September 11 families in the litigation against Saudi Arabia
Read More

“Islamism, both the ideology and the violence, is a first order security threat and, unchecked, it will come to us, even if centred far from us, as 9/11 demonstrated. COVID-19 has taught us about deadly pathogens. Bio-terror possibilities may seem like the realm of science fiction. But we would be wise now to prepare for their potential use by non-state actors. Counter-terrorism on its own won't remove an entrenched threat. We need some boots on the ground. Naturally our preference is for the boots to be local but that will not always be possible.”

author
Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
Read More

“No one who is serious about counterterrorism believes it [that counterterrorism operations could be conducted from outside Afghanistan]. The United States is going to pay a terrible price for this at some point in the future. Another 9/11.”

author
Analyst/commentator East/South Asia - Former deputy assistant secretary of defense for Afghanistan, Pakistan and Central Asia
Read More

“When I came to office, I inherited a deal cut by my predecessor-which he invited the Taliban to discuss at Camp David on the eve of 9/11 of 2019-that left the Taliban in the strongest position militarily since 2001 and imposed a May 1, 2021 deadline on U.S. Forces. Shortly before he left office, he also drew U.S. Forces down to a bare minimum of 2,500. Therefore, when I became President, I faced a choice-follow through on the deal, with a brief extension to get our Forces and our allies' Forces out safely, or ramp up our presence and send more American troops to fight once again in another country's civil conflict. I was the fourth President to preside over an American troop presence in Afghanistan-two Republicans, two Democrats. I would not, and will not, pass this war onto a fifth.”

author
President of the United States
Read More

“The idea that the intelligence community can stay with the U.S. military leaving? I just don't see how that's possible. You're almost going to a pre-9/11 collection posture in Afghanistan, which didn't turn out so well.”

author
Former top CIA operations officer who served in Afghanistan
Read More

“From designating Cuba to fictitious Iran "declassifications” and AQ [al-Qaeda] claims, Mr. 'we lie, cheat, steal' is pathetically ending his disastrous career with more warmongering lies. No one is fooled. All 9/11 terrorists came from @SecPompeo's favorite ME [Middle East] destinations; NONE from Iran.”

author
Foreign Minister of Iran
Read More
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Country
arrow