IPSE'S AUTHORS LAST 24h
Check all the Authors in the last 24h
IPSEs IN THE LAST 24H
  • Yair Lapid
    Yair Lapid “This government has to choose: return the abductees alive, or Ben Gvir and Smotrich, relations with the Americans or Ben Gvir and Smotrich, the Saudi deal or Ben Gvir and Smotrich, Israel's security or Ben Gvir and Smotrich.” 5 hours ago
  • Dmitry Peskov
    Dmitry Peskov “On the Ukrainian side, the panic is growing on the frontline. And this is first-hand information that there, on that side, the panic is growing. It is very important for us now to maintain this dynamics. It is very important not to stop and continue fulfilling [the tasks of the special military operation].” 8 hours ago
  • Oleksandr Syrskyi
    Oleksandr Syrskyi “In general, the enemy achieved certain tactical successes in these areas [villages of Berdychi and Semenivka, north of Avdiivka, and Novomykhailivka, near the town of Maryinka], but could not gain operational advantages.” 8 hours ago
  • Rina Shah
    Rina Shah “Protests in US universities are a display of democracy in action, a welcome sight in an election year marked by concerns of voter apathy chiefly due to Israel's war on Gaza. So when I see a movement like this of students taking peaceful, non-violent action and expressing their concern about the US government backing of Israel, of where our tax money is going, I think that's extremely healthy. These students are out there concerned about America's role in backing Benjamin Netanyahu. On the one hand, we are supplying weapons and funds to do what he wants to do in Gaza, while on the other we are sending humanitarian aid to Gaza. This is the hypocrisy these students are concerned about.” 23 hours ago
View All IPSEs inserted in the Last 24h
NEW CONTEXTS IN THE LAST 24H
  • No New Contexts inserted in the last 24 hours
View All New Contexts inserted in the last 24h

#1992 consensus

Page with all the IPSEs stored in the archive with the tag #1992 consensus linked to them.
The IPSEs are presented in chronological order based on when the IPSEs have been pronounced.

“Our stance on resolving the Taiwan question and realizing national reunification remains consistent, and our determination is as firm as rock. We will adhere to the 1992 Consensus that embodies the one-China principle and firmly oppose the separatist activities aimed at 'Taiwan independence' as well as foreign interference.”

author
Spokesperson for the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office
Read More

“The mainland encourages and supports normal business exchanges between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits, and protects the legitimate rights and interests of Taiwan compatriots and companies in accordance with the law. However, no one or company is allowed to sabotage cross-Straits relations by providing financial aid to secessionists while making money on the mainland. This attitude is clear and consistent, and Taiwan companies investing in the mainland are well aware of it. There is no room for ambiguity about whether to adhere to the one-China principle and the 1992 Consensus, and whether to oppose or support secessionists.”

author
Spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office
Read More

“People on both sides of the Strait [Taiwan Strait] once again fell into a downward malicious spiral. In the past, the two sides of the Strait have had the glory of peaceful and stable development, to which the 1992 consensus was key. Since the KMT's [Chinese Nationalist Party] proposal in September last year of the concept of a 1992 consensus based on the Republic of China Constitution, public understanding and trust in the consensus has gradually recovered.”

author
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman
Read More

“The US and Taiwan must prepare for China's eventual realization that neither peaceful nor coercive tactics would push Taiwanese into accepting reunification. Direct negotiations with Beijing are unlikely, given that the latter has set its desired outcome - Taiwan's acceptance of the so-called '1992 consensus' - as a precondition for resuming talks. Unfortunately, I fear that we're at a stage where deterrence is probably the most important thing Taiwan can do.”

author
Chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan
Read More

“The two sides of the Strait need to restore or rebuild a common political foundation. Recognition of the 'consensus' [1992 consensus] would be necessary for Tsai to realize her campaign promise of maintaining the 'status quo' in cross-strait relations. Tsai [Tsai Ing-wen] and the DPP [Democratic Progressive Party] have tarnished the 1992 consensus by equating it with the 'one country, two systems' framework. The Republic of China Constitution does not allow for two Chinas, or one China and one Taiwan. If Tsai would clearly affirm this there could be room for cross-strait dialogue.”

author
Taiwanese politician who served as the sixth president of the Republic of China from 2008 to 2016
Read More

“Upholding the '1992 consensus' and opposing Taiwan Independence is the common political foundation for mutual trust, communication, and cooperation between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the KMT”

author
Spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office
Read More
IPSEs by Author
IPSEs by Country
arrow